Hello all, I don’t need to sound conceited however to me whenever you purchase a 4000 euro/$ R5 or 2200 euro/$ R6 and even an R3, why you’d purchase a lens like that? No offense please however I believe that on the finish, what makes an awesome image beside sensor and total digital camera is after all photographer AND an awesome lens! The lens is usually the important thing and for such a low value I doubt that lenses like that would compete so nicely in opposition to a Canon RF or a Sigma Artwork or Laowa Zero…
This has already been answered by others, so I’m actually simply reiterating what others have mentioned, however …
1. Greater value doesn’t essentially imply higher product. I believe it is honest to say that you simply typically get what you pay for, but it surely’s not assured.
2. What’s a greater lens relies upon rather a lot on precisely what you need to use it for and the circumstances by which you shoot, and there are many components that are related, eg totally different elements of IQ (sharpness, bokeh, coma, and so forth), weight, measurement, AF pace, and so forth. All gear, even “the perfect”, includes a set of includes which can or might not fit your use case.
3. A big a part of what you pay for with an L lens is usually construct high quality. That typically means bigger, heavier and dearer. Having wonderful construct high quality is not equally vital to everybody. It’s simply one of many components which matches into deciding what lens fits your specific use case.
4. Even in the event you can say one lens is healthier than one other in some sense, that simply begs the questions how a lot better and is it value it in your use case? Will anybody truly discover the distinction in your pictures? Particularly, will anybody discover the distinction given the best way you intend to show it (social media, massive prints, no matter)? If it should it allow you to shoot in circumstances you could not in any other case shoot in, will you truly begin capturing in these circumstances?
Personally, if I had an R5 (or R3 or some other RF mount digital camera) and I used to be shopping for an RF mount 85mm, I might virtually definitely get the Samyang 85 f/1.4, though I might additionally check out this Viltrox. The Canon RF 85L lenses could also be implausible lenses optically, however I do not desire a 1kg 85mm prime, not to mention on the value they go for. It simply would not go well with my use case so I would not use it typically. And I’ve not seen something which has impressed me concerning the RF 85 f/2 IS. It is sharp sufficient, positive, however the total IQ, comparatively sluggish most aperture, apparently sluggish AF, and the very fact it’s not even notably small or mild given it’s f/2, imply it would not attraction to me. The truth is, I might moderately an adapated EF 85 f/1.8 as opposed to the RF 85 f/2. YMMV.
So, select the lens which most accurately fits you and your use case, not simply the costliest one or the one which the web tells you is “greatest”.