Bizarre and distinctive are usually not all the time nice descriptions for brand spanking new merchandise. Within the case of the DJI Ronin 4D which will have been the purpose as they made one thing that’s each fascinating and has robust potential for filmmakers on the lookout for a single cinema digicam that may do all of it.
You may even wish to see if it’s all flash with the built-in gimbal and fancy autofocus or really worthwhile by evaluating it to current choices, just like the Sony a7S III. In case you are curious concerning the Ronin 4D and in any respect nervous about picture high quality, this comparability from filmmaker Peter Lindgren is simply what you want.
Placing collectively footage from each the Sony a7S III and DJI Ronin 4D reveals what number of trendy digital cameras are superb.
These two full-frame fashions are very completely different. Lindgren does contemplate the truth that the a7S III with all the additional items (gimbal, exterior monitor, and so forth.) provides as much as be related in worth and options to the Ronin 4D. So are you able to get equal footage on every digicam?
Nicely, the a7S III is so much lighter and simpler to work with whereas the Ronin’s all-in-one design could be very handy and efficient although it all the time has the additional weight. Within the forest checks, the precise footage from every was almost not possible to inform the distinction between the 2.
One factor you could see within the head-to-head checks is stabilization. The Ronin 4D simply beats out the a7S III on a DJI RS 2. The bigger design of the Ronin 4D could also be extra interesting for skilled units as you don’t need to spend time rigging up your digicam and it has that greater, “professional” look.
One other factor is that the Ronin 4D will do Uncooked recording internally. This additional flexibility without having a ton of additional tools is a big profit. Although, there may be nonetheless a word to be made that the a7S III will do uncooked out to an Atomos recorder.
Nonetheless, the Ronin does do 6K video too so you’ve gotten a bit extra flexibility. Plus you’ve gotten the choice to change out lens mounts if you would like for extra lens selection. The opposite aspect of that is that the Ronin is technically restricted in what lenses will work for the reason that gimbal has a weight restrict.
The place the a7S III does clearly win is with the scale issue. It’s tiny and simply may be thrown in almost any bag for each day.
It’s the one you can be extra more likely to take out with you, plus it may be utilized in conditions and setups the place a full-size digicam just like the Ronin 4D simply can’t match. It’s nonetheless an incredible software to have readily available.
Which might you choose? The Ronin 4D or the a7S III?
[source: Peter Lindgren]