As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

Patent: Canon RF 17-70mm f/4-5.6 BR | Canon Rumors

Not faulting Canon for attempting new instructions with RF lenses. It’s good to tell apart themselves from different producers like Sony. Sadly that’s usually leaving out the wonderful mid-priced lenses usually with both very quick, very top quality, however overpriced lenses or cheaper, decrease decision lens. Canon is aware of the market and what they’re doing, however that leaves me caught in he center and I’d assume, lots of critical however not skilled photographers additionally caught within the center. I imply hell, there may be a budget 50 1.8 or 50 1.2. Simply gimme a goddam high quality 50mm lens like Nikon’s 50 1.8. Then there may be the difficulty of the R6. Sure, it’s glorious, however for $100 extra I might get a Nikon Z6II with 24-70 f/4. Canon has higher focus and general is healthier, however as one eager about panorama and basic nature pictures (I do not do video) I might give a rats ass in regards to the higher autofocus. I cringe after I see these reviewers operating at you and darting backward and forward to check the autofocus. To cite John Shaw in his guide…John Shaw’s Concentrate on Nature: “Not As soon as have my lenses gone out and brought {a photograph}.” I do not intend on switching from Canon. It has served me extraordinarily nicely and I’m positive ought to I am going to mirrorless I’d nonetheless have gear able to glorious photographs even going with the cheaper lenses, however will not accept any lens numerically increased than f4, except one thing like a 500mm f/5.6, however I will not maintain my breath on that one.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart